KORBER v. LEHMAN


41 Misc.2d 568 (1963)

Michael Korber, Plaintiff, v. Robert Lehman et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Lehman Brothers, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

December 10, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett (Stephen P. Duggan, Jr., Rolon W. Reed and Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., of counsel), for defendants. Abraham D. Levy and Michael R. Russakow for plaintiff.


VINCENT A. LUPIANO, J.

Defendants move pursuant to rule 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for dismissal of the second cause of action for insufficiency. The first cause is based on common-law fraud. In the second cause it is alleged and charged that the acts, subject of the first cause, constitute a violation of subdivision 2 of section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 (U. S. Code...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases