Order affirmed.
The application is predicated upon the claim that illegally seized evidence was presented to the Grand Jury which returned the indictment. Defendant, prior to the judgment of conviction, did not move to suppress the illegal evidence, but instead pleaded guilty to the indictment. Nor did defendant appeal from the judgment of conviction. Under the circumstances, on this application he may not raise the question of the admissibility of the evidence (...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
