YAHNEL v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF JAMESBURG


79 N.J. Super. 509 (1963)

192 A.2d 177

ETHEL YAHNEL, JACK AND IRMA SAUERMAN AND RUDOLPH AND MARY ANN WOLFINGER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF JAMESBURG, N.J., MAYOR AND BOROUGH COUNCIL OF JAMESBURG, N.J., FRANK PERGOLA, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND MICHAEL AND ROSE SEMINARA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 20, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick F. Richardson argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. William C. Davis argued the cause for respondents New Jersey Bell Telephone Company and Michael and Rose Seminara (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Guido J. Brigiani argued the cause for respondents Board of Adjustment of Jamesburg, Mayor and Borough Council of Jamesburg, and Frank Pergola, Building Inspector of Jamesburg.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The Jamesburg board of adjustment recommended and the borough council approved a variance from the zoning ordinance to permit the construction in an "A" residence zone of a one-story brick and masonry building by the New Jersey Bell Telephone Company for the maintenance of equipment to provide dial telephone service in the Jamesburg area. Neighboring residence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases