1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 18 Wis.2d
  5. 18 Wis.2d 566 (1963)
 

SCHNECK v. MUTUAL SERVICE CAS. INS. CO.

18 Wis.2d 566 (1963)

SCHNECK, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants, v. MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. TOWLE, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants, v. SAME, Respondent. BRANDT, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants, v. SAME, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kelley & Maeder of Wausau, for the Brandts; Walter A. Graunke of Wausau, for the Schnecks; and Crooks & Crooks of Wausau, for the Towles; and oral argument by Mr. Leo D. Crooks, Mr. Graunke, and Mr. Jerome A. Maeder.

For the respondent there were briefs by Smith, Puchner, Tinkham & Smith of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham.

HALLOWS, J.

One of the grounds for granting a new trial in the interest of justice was the admission in evidence, over the objection of the defendant, of the certificate of the motor vehicle department showing the defendant had not corrected the SR-21 form in compliance with sec. 344.15 (5), Stats. The trial court thought the defendant did not have an opportunity to adequately present its defense to this claim which was not raised in the pleadings or disclosed until...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases