1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 131 S.E.2d
  5. 131 S.E.2d 452 (1963)
 

STATE v. FORBES TRANSFER COMPANY

No. 470.

131 S.E.2d 452 (1963)

259 N.C. 688

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. FORBES TRANSFER COMPANY, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 14, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vaughan S. Winborne, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Barbee, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

BOBBITT, Justice.

The question for decision is whether Forbes has the legal right, by combining or "tacking" the irregular route authority it purchased from F L Express and its original irregular route authority, to transport commodities between Wilson, on the one hand, and Charlotte, Gastonia, and Asheville, on the other hand, provided such shipments are routed and pass through Goldsboro. Charlotte, Gastonia, and Asheville are west of U. S. Highway 52.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases