1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 215 F.Supp.
  5. 215 F.Supp. 367 (1963)
 

ELECTROLUX CORPORATION v. DUSTPAK, LTD.

No. 60 C 608.

215 F.Supp. 367 (1963)

ELECTROLUX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DUSTPAK LTD., Inc. and Anschel Wolf, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

March 25, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Kelton, New York City (Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, Elmer R. Helferich, and Thomas C. Betts, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Samuel J. Stoll, Jamaica, N. Y., for defendants.

DOOLING, District Judge.

In this suit for infringement of two patents relating to the construction of disposable paper filter bags for use, primarily, in vacuum cleaners of the horizontal cylinder type it has been concluded that the older patent is invalid for want of patentable novelty and that the more recent patent is invalid as embracing nothing not described and claimed in the earlier patent. Findings and conclusions have been made separately.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases