1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 545 (1963)
 

SCHILLER v. KEUFFEL & ESSER CO.

21 Wis.2d 545 (1963)

SCHILLER, Appellant, v. KEUFFEL & ESSER COMPANY, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 26, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Bender, Trump, Davidson & Godfrey, attorneys, and Kneeland A. Godfrey and Thomas W. Godfrey of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Thomas W. Godfrey.

For the respondent there was a brief by Quarles, Herriott & Clemons, attorneys, and James C. Mallien of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Mallien.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. The testimony. "A verdict should only be directed against a plaintiff where plaintiff's evidence, giving it the most-favorable construction it will reasonably bear, is insufficient to sustain a verdict in plaintiff's favor."1

Applying the rule just stated, we may summarize the substance of Mr. Schiller's testimony as follows:

The bulk of Schiller's business came from 20 concerns. Schiller had customarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases