TURK v. H.C. PRANGE CO.


18 Wis.2d 547 (1963)

TURK and another, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. H. C. PRANGE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Interpleaded Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 9, 1963.

February 5, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Dudley O. Emmert of Manitowoc.

For the respondent H. C. Prange Company there was a brief by Gruhle, Fessler, Wissbroecker & Van de Water if Sheboygan, and oral argument by Douglas K. Van de Water and Jacob A. Fessler.

For the respondent Otis Elevator Company there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, attorneys, and Donald R. Peterson and Donald L. Johnson of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Peterson.


WILKIE, J.

1. Plaintiffs' counsel's opening statement. The first issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error against the plaintiffs in ruling counsel's opening statement, that this was a res ipsa loquitur case, improper, and in denying plaintiffs' motion for a mistrial based on said ruling.

During his opening statement to the jury the plaintiffs' attorney attempted to enlighten the jury on the effect of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases