1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 328 (1963)
 

MITCHELL v. CASWELL

233 Or. 328 (1963)

377 P.2d 911

MITCHELL v. CASWELL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Helgeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Fredric A. Yerke, Jr., and Jean P. Lowman, Portland.

Harry A. Harris, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Stanley J. Mitchell, Oregon City.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

In this case plaintiff alleged that defendant was indebted to plaintiff's assignors for logging equipment furnished to defendant by plaintiff's assignors. Defendant denied the indebtedness and claimed he was engaged with the alleged creditor in a joint venture. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court found for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The evidence clearly supports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases