1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 19 Wis.2d
  5. 19 Wis.2d 537 (1963)
 

HURST v. HUNGERFORD

19 Wis.2d 537 (1963)

HURST, Appellant, v. HUNGERFORD and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 2, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by John E. Esler of Kaukauna.

For the respondents there was a brief by Holden & Peckham of Sheboygan, and oral argument by Verlin H. Peckham.

CURRIE, J.

Upon oral argument plaintiff's counsel raised a point not mentioned in the briefs. This is that the order for new trial was entered more than sixty days after return, of the verdict without any order having been entered extending the time within which the circuit court might decide the motions after verdict. Defendants' counsel conceded that no order had been entered extending the time for deciding these motions, and the record discloses none.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases