HARRELL v. DOVE MFG. CO.


234 Or. 321 (1963)

381 P.2d 710

HARRELL, JR. v. DOVE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 22, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick A. Jahnke, Portland, argued the cause and submitted the brief for appellant.

Harvey J. Osborn, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Roscoe E. Watts, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by a corporation entitled Dove Manufacturing Company from a judgment of the circuit court entered upon an arbitration award in favor of one Harry E. Harrell. During the proceedings the appellant Dove Manufacturing Company was referred to as "the respondent" and Harrell as "the petitioner." For purposes of our consideration of the issues before us, we adopt those designations of the parties.

By a contract dated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases