CRAMER v. STATE CONCRETE CORP.


39 N.J. 507 (1963)

189 A.2d 213

GERALD CRAMER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE CONCRETE CORP., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 18, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank P. Lucianna argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

The question is whether an employee is barred from recovering workmen's compensation under our statute because he obtained an award against his employer in New York. The Division of Workmen's Compensation and the county court held he was barred. We certified his appeal before the Appellate Division acted upon it.

The contract of employment was made in this State between parties who were and continued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases