STATE v. WILLENSON


20 Wis.2d 519 (1963)

STATE, Plaintiff, v. WILLENSON, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 1, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there was a brief and oral argument by Rudolph P. Regez of Monroe, counsel for the Board of State Bar Commissioners.

For the defendant there was a brief by L. A. Willenson, pro se, and oral argument by Henry L. Arnold, both of Milwaukee.


PER CURIAM.

It appears that defendant attorney maintains an office for the practice of law, in one window of a which appears his name and "Lawyer," and in an adjacent window a neon sign "Income Tax."

The first count upon demurrer raises the question whether the use of a neon sign "Income Tax" in the window of a lawyer's law office is unprofessional conduct.

The second count alleges that defendant's wife, conceded not to be a lawyer, conducts an income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases