1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 389 P.2d
  5. 389 P.2d 146 (1963)
 

STATE v. HASHIMOTO

No. 4179.

389 P.2d 146 (1963)

STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Error, v. David K. HASHIMOTO, George M. Tanisue, Florendo Guillermo, Leo Bajo, Aurelio Barro, Alfred L. Canianes and Henry A. Alejandro, Defendants, Plaintiffs-in-Error.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Kimura, Honolulu, for Hashimoto, Alejandro and Tanisue, plaintiffs-in-error.

Robert H. K. Chang, Honolulu, for Canianes, plaintiff-in-error.

David K. Namaka, Honolulu, for Bajo, plaintiff-in-error.

Nathaniel Felzer, Honolulu, for Guillermo and Barro, plaintiffs-in-error.

Daniel G. Ridley, Honolulu, for all plaintiffs-in-error.

George I. Hieda, Deputy Pros. Atty., City and County of Honolulu (John H. Peters, Pros. Atty.), for defendant-in-error.

Before TSUKIYAMA, C. J., and CASSIDY, WIRTZ, LEWIS and MIZUHA, JJ.

TSUKIYAMA, Chief Justice.

Defendants, David K. Hashimoto, George M. Tanisue, Florendo Guillermo, Leo Bajo, Aurelio Barro, Alfred L. Canianes and Henry A. Alejandro, were indicted, tried and convicted in the First Circuit Court of the crime of rape. They are now before this court on writ of error.1

According to the evidence upon which there appears to be no dispute, on July 8, 1959, Janet Schenck and her escort Gene Smith drove...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases