1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 235 Or.
  5. 235 Or. 295 (1963)
 

VALE v. BROOKS

235 Or. 295 (1963)

384 P.2d 141

VALE v. BROOKS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 31, 1963.

Petition for rehearing denied September 4, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reuben Lenske, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Frederic P. Roehr, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Vergeer & Samuels, Portland.

Before PERRY, Presiding Justice, and O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by a husband for loss of consortium. The wife had previously obtained a judgment for damages for personal injuries against the defendant. The plaintiff-husband assigns as error the trial court's refusal to hold that the judgment in the wife's action finally adjudicated the question of negligence and contributory negligence. This contention was rejected in Wolff v. Du Puis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases