1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 18 Wis.2d
  5. 18 Wis.2d 505 (1963)
 

HARTENSTEIN v. HARTENSTEIN

18 Wis.2d 505 (1963)

HARTENSTEIN (Greta), Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HARTENSTEIN (Richard), Defendant and Appellant: HARTENSTEIN (Eva), Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 8, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Richard Hartenstein there were briefs and oral argument by Herman J. Posner of Milwaukee.

For the appellant Eva Hartenstein there were briefs and oral argument by A. L. Skolnik of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there were briefs by Aaron L. Weiss and Ruppa & Wegner, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Weiss and Mr. Nathan Ruppa.

CURRIE, J.

These two appeals present the issue of whether Wisconsin courts are required under sec. 1, art. IV, U. S. Const.,1 to give full faith and credit to the Nevada decree of divorce entered in the action in that state in which Greta was the plaintiff and Richard the defendant.

Greta's counsel advance two contentions why this Nevada decree should not be accorded full faith and credit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases