CLARK v. MORU


19 Wis.2d 503 (1963)

CLARK and wife, Appellants, v. MORU and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 2, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.

For the respondents there was a brief by Brookhouse & Kupfer and Mittelstaed, Heide, Sheldon & Hartley, all of Kenosha, and oral argument by Andrew R. Brookhouse.


GORDON, J.

The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that there was a unilateral mistake on the part of the plaintiffs as to the location of their western boundary line. Judge BAKER also found as a fact that at the time of the closing of the transaction the purchasers accepted the terminology of the deed as the description of the parcel of land being purchased. The trial court further determined that the plaintiffs' mistake as to the location of the western boundary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases