BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
1. It was error to suggest by leading questions on cross-examination of appellant that he had participated in specific acts of criminal conduct, not resulting in convictions, other than those with which he was charged. The questions could not be justified as impeachment; "only a conviction . . . may be inquired about to undermine the trustworthiness of a witness." Michelson v. United States,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.