1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 385 P.2d
  5. 385 P.2d 129 (1963)
 

SMITH v. CITY OF AURORA

No. 20515.

385 P.2d 129 (1963)

S. Lee SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY OF AURORA, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

September 16, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelley, Inman & Flynn, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Bernard V. Berardini, George B. Lee, Aurora, for defendant in error.

MOORE, Justice.

S. Lee Smith as plaintiff in the trial court filed his complaint attacking the validity of annexation proceedings conducted in the county court of Arapahoe county. He alleged in the complaint that he was an "aggrieved person" within the meaning of C.R.S.1953, 139-11-6 which provides, inter alia:

"Any person aggrieved by any annexation proceedings had under this article, may apply at any time within ninety days after the effective date of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases