NICK v. STATE HIGHWAY COMM.


21 Wis.2d 489 (1963)

NICK, Appellant, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 26, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Walstead, Anderson, Bylsma & Eisenberg of Madison, and oral argument by Elliott N. Walstead.

For the respondent the cause was argued by A. J. Feifarek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was George Thompson, attorney general.


GORDON, J.

In Nick v. State Highway Comm. (1961), 13 Wis.2d 511, 109 N.W.2d 71, this court held that an impairment of the use of property by the exercise of the police power, where the property itself is not taken by the state, does not entitle the owner of such property to compensation. It was noted that Mrs. Nick still had access to Highway 30 via the use of Calhoun road.

The court relied on the reasoning of ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases