HECHT v. AIR REDUCTION CO.


41 Misc.2d 463 (1963)

Max Hecht et al., Doing Business as Chelsea Carbonic & Repair Service, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Air Reduction Company, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

December 17, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sale & Sale for plaintiffs. De Zorett & Venner for Hygrade Compressed Gas Corp., defendant. Shearman & Sterling for Air Reduction Company, Inc., defendant.


JAMES J. CRISONA, J.

Defendant Hygrade Compressed Gas Corp. (hereinafter referred to as "Hygrade") and defendant Air Reduction Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Air Reduction") move, by separate notice of motion, to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency.

Since both motions were submitted to the court several months after the effective date of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases