1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 366 S.W.2d
  5. 366 S.W.2d 129 (1963)
 

FEDERATED MUT. IMPLEMENT & HARD. CO. v. SHOEMAKER

366 S.W.2d 129 (1963)

FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE COMPANY v. Edgar SHOEMAKER.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

On Petition for Rehearing April 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ambrose, Wilson & Saulpaw, Knoxville, for petitioner.

Porter & Porter, Newport, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has filed a petition to rehear and has called our attention to some facts which were overlooked and not considered in our original opinion.

It is said in the petition:

"This decision is erroneously based upon the assumption that Edgar Shoemaker had worked for Connie Overholt, off and on, on other occasions, when in fact the date in question was the only occasion that Mr. Shoemaker had ever been employed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases