ROGER J. WAYBRIGHT, Associate Judge.
The appellant was convicted under all nine counts of an indictment charging him, as an agent of the state beverage department, with accepting bribes, conspiring to accept bribes, and conspiring for others to give bribes.
The appellant contends that the state, in presenting its case in chief against him, did not present evidence sufficient positively to identify him. There may be some merit to that contention with respect...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.