1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 235 Or.
  5. 235 Or. 257 (1963)
 

SCHOENEMAN v. BENNETT

235 Or. 257 (1963)

384 P.2d 217

SCHOENEMAN v. BENNETT

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed August 2, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Krieger, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Black, Kendall, Tremaine, Boothe & Higgins, Portland.

George Joseph, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, and Robert M. Christ, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by petitioner in the circuit court for Multnomah county to require the respondent as clerk of the district court for Multnomah county to issue a writ of attachment. A demurrer to an alternative writ was sustained and the writ dismissed. Petitioner has appealed.

We were informed on oral argument that this proceeding was instituted by petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases