RIDGELY v. RIDGELY

No. 3139.

188 A.2d 296 (1963)

Charles H. RIDGELY, Appellant, v. Ruth M. RIDGELY, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 21, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Sutphin, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Alfred S. Fried, Washington, D. C., with whom Harold J. Rogers, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.


HOOD, Chief Judge.

A husband appeals from an order awarding maintenance to his wife and requiring him to convey to her a half interest in their joint bank account and a half interest in Maryland real estate owned by them as tenants by the entireties.

A preliminary claim of error is that the trial court failed to make the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 11 of the Domestic Relations Branch. This claim is without merit. The rule does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases