1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 60 Cal.2d
  5. 60 Cal.2d 417 (1963)
 

HONOLULU OIL CORP. v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

Docket No. S.F. 21210.

60 Cal.2d 417 (1963)

386 P.2d 40

34 Cal. Rptr. 552

HONOLULU OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 29, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert W. Clark, Franklin C. Latcham, Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark and Roger W. Findley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Forrest N. Shumway and Loren P. Oakes as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, James E. Sabine and Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorneys General, and Frank M. Keesling for Defendant and Respondent.

PEEK, J.

Plaintiff Honolulu Oil Corporation appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant Franchise Tax Board of the State of California in an action by the company to recover alleged overpayments of the corporate franchise tax in each of the taxable years 1951, 1952, 1953, and 1954.

Honolulu Oil Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal offices located in San Francisco. During the years in question it engaged in exploration for, and extraction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases