IPOCK v. DAUGHERTY

No. 100.

132 S.E.2d 344 (1963)

260 N.C. 213

B. E. IPOCK v. E. W. DAUGHERTY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunn & Dunn by Raymond E. Dunn, New Bern, for plaintiff appellee.

John W. Beaman and Robert G. Bowers, New Bern, for defendant appellant.


PER CURIAM.

The basic question for decision was a factual one: What was the contract? Was it, as plaintiff alleged, to pay for labor and materials; or was it, as defendant alleged, to remodel the dwelling for the sum of $3150, which defendant has paid?

Plaintiff testified he contracted to do specific work for a specific sum as alleged by defendant, but when he started the work, defendant decided to materially increase the work to be done. They then agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases