PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted on three counts of an indictment charging violations of the narcotics laws, 26 U.S.C. §§ 4704(a), 4705(a), and 21 U.S.C. § 174 (1958). Appellant's able court-appointed counsel (who was not of counsel at the trial) has made three allegations of error. Two of them relate to questions posed to the court by the jury after it had begun its deliberations. Counsel urges that the answers given by the judge were prejudicial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.