1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 132 S.E.2d
  5. 132 S.E.2d 334 (1963)
 

STATE v. ORR

No. 2.

132 S.E.2d 334 (1963)

260 N.C. 177

STATE v. Dallas ORR.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., James F. Bullock, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

McKeever & Edwards, by Herman Edwards, Murphy, for defendant-appellant.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendant contends that the trial court committed error (1) by overruling his motion to dismiss; and (2) by giving the jury conflicting instructions as to the quantum of proof necessary to convict. All other exceptions and assignments of error are abandoned.

The prosecuting witness, a woman 57 years of age, testified for the State, detailing circumstances sufficient to go to the jury and to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases