1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 132 S.E.2d
  5. 132 S.E.2d 332 (1963)
 

WILBURN v. WILBURN

No. 103.

132 S.E.2d 332 (1963)

260 N.C. 208

Arthur Julius WILBURN v. Yetta Eliza Jackson Ragbir WILBURN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Pennell and Dailey & Harrell by Ruben J. Dailey, Asheville, for plaintiff appellee.

George L. Bumpass, Nathaniel L. Belcher, and Floyd H. Brown, Durham, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns as error the court's refusal to grant her request for a continuance made on 5 March. Continuances are not favored. The granting or denial of a motion to continue is a matter in the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is made to appear. Cleeland v. Cleeland, 249 N.C. 16, 105 S.E.2d 114; Watters v. Parrish,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases