STATE v. DIXON

No. 292.

130 S.E.2d 333 (1963)

259 N.C. 249

STATE of North Carolina v. Osbie Norwood DIXON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., New Bern, for defendant-appellant.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., and G. A. Jones, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


PER CURIAM.

There is no thaumaturgy which can transform into newly discovered evidence defendant's ignorance at the time of his trial that the blood sample, about which he did not inquire, would not have been available if he had demanded it. The seven prerequisites to the granting of a new trial for newly discovered evidence are listed seriatim by Stacy, C. J., in State v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81. Defendant meets not one of these requirements. Furthermore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases