Per Curiam.
Upon oral argument in this court, defense counsel suggested that respondent might be mentally ill. No suggestion of mental illness was made during the hearings before the board and no proof was offered tending to establish such fact. From a consideration of the record, this court is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its findings and recommendation. Although respondent was not personally present during the oral...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
