WHITE v. RUCKER

No. 25.

132 S.E.2d 327 (1963)

260 N.C. 226

John Quincy WHITE, Jr. v. Mary Owens RUCKER, and Alex Rudolph Perry, and Joseph Isreal Perry.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Chaffin, Elizabeth City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Russell E. Twiford, Elizabeth City, for defendant-appellee Rucker.

LeRoy, Wells & Shaw, Elizabeth City, for defendants-appellees Perry.


PER CURIAM.

The crucial (factual) questions were for determination by the jury. We find nothing sufficient to indicate the jury failed to understand and apply the pertinent principles of law.

We have considered each of plaintiff's thirty-eight assignments of error. Conceding technical error in certain respects, a careful review of the evidence and charge leaves the impression there was no error sufficient to amount to a denial of a substantial right or to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases