1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 433 (1963)
 

SCHMIDT v. SCHMIDT

21 Wis.2d 433 (1963)

SCHMIDT (Elizabeth), Plaintiff, v. SCHMIDT (Floyd), Defendant and Appellant: SCHMIDT (Carlos), Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 26, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Zwickey & Zwickey of Clintonville, and oral argument by A. Don Zwickey.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Richard E. Johnson of Waupaca.

GORDON, J.

We are asked on this appeal to find that there was a "clear and satisfactory preponderance of the evidence" upon which the trial court should have found that Floyd Schmidt was not the father of the child, Carlos.

The evidence which tends to support the judgment of the trial court consists of the following factors:

1. Elizabeth and Floyd Schmidt were husband and wife at the time of the child's birth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases