IN RE TRASK

No. 4104.

46 Haw. 404 (1963)

380 P.2d 751

IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR K. TRASK, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

March 29, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W.B. Chang and Howard K. Hoddick (O. Vincent Esposito and Hoddick, Rothwell & Chang on the briefs) for respondent.

Shiro Kashiwa, Attorney General, and Yoshio Shigezawa, Deputy Attorney General, contra.

TSUKIYAMA, C.J., CASSIDY, WIRTZ, JJ., CIRCUIT JUDGE JAMIESON IN PLACE OF LEWIS, J., DISQUALIFIED, AND CIRCUIT JUDGE HEWITT IN PLACE OF MIZUHA, J., DISQUALIFIED.


Per Curiam.

This matter is before us on exceptions taken by Arthur K. Trask, respondent attorney, to the report submitted to the court on November 6, 1958, by the commissioners on improper or unprofessional conduct (commonly designated the legal ethics committee) appointed and acting under rule 16 of this court. It was the unanimous finding of the three commissioners submitting the report that the respondent was guilty of unethical conduct and it was their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases