1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 213 F.Supp.
  5. 213 F.Supp. 232 (1963)
 

UNITED STATES v. DiGRAZIA

No. 62 CR 16.

213 F.Supp. 232 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Phillip Joseph DiGRAZIA, Peter James Gushi, Anthony Francis Daddino, John J. Torello, Medo Calzavara, Rose Calzavara and Peter DiFronzo, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

January 25, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. O'Brien, U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Eugene T. Daly, Waukegan, Ill., for defendants.

WILL, District Judge.

Defendants Rose and Medo Calzavara have moved to quash the indictment in the present cause as it relates to them. The motion is based on the alleged violation of certain asserted constitutional rights in connection with their separate appearances before a Federal Grand Jury in May, 1961.

At an oral hearing in this Court pursuant to the motion, testimony was taken of both Rose and Medo Calzavara and of the F.B.I. agents and Assistant U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases