R.H. MACY & CO., INC. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION


41 N.J. 3 (1963)

194 A.2d 457

R.H. MACY & CO., INC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 21, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Marvin H. Gladstone, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Alan B. Handler, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Conford in his opinion for the Appellate Division. See 77 N.J.Super. 155 (1962). That opinion declined to pass on the issue of discrimination because it had not been raised before the Division of Tax Appeals; we note that the issue was similarly not included in the points set forth in the brief filed by the appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases