1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 150 Conn.
  5. 150 Conn. 290 (1963)
 

MACK v. SAARS

150 Conn. 290 (1963)

MAURICE H. MACK v. WALTER F. SAARS ET AL., v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 26, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Covert, with whom were John M. Chapnick and, on the brief, Bruce E. Dillingham, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Raymond J. Cannon, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Albert L. Coles, attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

BALDWIN, C. J., KING, MURPHY, SHEA and ALCORN, JS.

BALDWIN, C. J.

The plaintiff, a licensed optometrist, has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court which sustained an order of the state board of examiners in optometry suspending his license to practice. In chapter 380 of the General Statutes, which regulates the practice of optometry, § 20-138a provides that no person shall practice optometry unless he has a license issued by the board. Under § 20-133 (e) of that chapter, the board, after a hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases