1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 413 Pa.
  5. 413 Pa. 23 (1963)
 

MURRY v. SIEGAL

413 Pa. 23 (1963)

Murray, Appellant, v. Siegal.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary F. Sharlock, with him Mercer & Buckley, for appellant.

Donald W. Bebenek, with him Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, for appellee.

Robert Engel, Assistant City Solicitor, with him David W. Craig, City Solicitor, for City of Pittsburgh, appellee.

Before MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN, December 3, 1963:

This is a personal injury action wherein the court en banc below sustained the action of the trial court's entry of a compulsory nonsuit. On appeal, the plaintiff questions the correctness of the judgment of nonsuit and certain rulings by the trial court rejecting proffered evidence.

In assessing the propriety of the entry of the nonsuit, certain fundamental legal principles must be kept in mind, namely, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases