ROEMER v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY

No. 20173.

380 P.2d 56 (1963)

Harry E. ROEMER and Lo Ree Roemer, Plaintiffs in Error, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department.

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. McLean, Marjorie Worland McLean, Denver, Benjamin W. Fann, Colorado Springs, for plaintiffs in error.

Sternberg & Taylor, Littleton, for defendant in error.


MOORE, Justice.

We will refer to plaintiffs in error as defendants, and to defendant in error as Sinclair.

Sinclair commenced the action for specific performance upon its election to exercise an alleged option to purchase certain real estate in Castle Rock, Colorado, which had been occupied by it since 1932 under a lease and option agreement entered into with the predecessor in interest of defendants.

Defendants answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases