STATE v. EYLE


236 Or. 199 (1963)

388 P.2d 110

STATE OF OREGON v. EYLE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 24, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Barrows, Deputy District Attorney for Umatilla County, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richard J. Courson, District Attorney for Umatilla County, Pendleton.

Donald D. Yokom, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed a brief for Appellant.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

Defendant was indicted for the violation of ORS 164.670. Trial was had without a jury before the Circuit Court of Umatilla County. From a judgment finding him guilty as charged, defendant appeals. The facts are not in dispute.

1-3. Defendant's argument upon appeal is that the prosecution failed to prove a necessary element of the crime of using a motor vehicle without authority; that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases