1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 40 N.J.
  5. 40 N.J. 389 (1963)
 

GREISMAN v. NEWCOMB HOSPITAL

40 N.J. 389 (1963)

192 A.2d 817

PAUL A. GREISMAN, D.O., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE NEWCOMB HOSPITAL, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nicholas Conover English argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. McCarter & English, by Mr. Woodruff J. English, of counsel; Messrs. Adamo and Pagliughi, attorneys for defendants-appellants, The Newcomb Hospital and Board of Trustees of The Newcomb Hospital; Messrs. Shapiro, Brotman & Eisenstat, attorneys for defendant-appellant, Medical Staff of The Newcomb Hospital).

Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Perskie & Perskie, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Law Division directed that the defendants consider the plaintiff's application for membership on the courtesy medical staff of the Newcomb Hospital without regard to a requirement in their bylaws which it declared to be void or invalid as to the plaintiff. See Greisman v. Newcomb Hospital, 76 N.J.Super. 149 (Law Div...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases