CONFECTIONERY & TOBACCO DRIVERS & WARE. U. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 124, 125, Dockets 27496-27528.

312 F.2d 108 (1963)

CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO DRIVERS AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 805, IBTCWHA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. M. ESKIN & SON, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 7, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katz & Wolchok, New York City (Charles R. Katz, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Robert Sewell, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for respondent.

Van Riper & Belmont, Newark, N. J. (Charles E. Villanueva, Newark, N. J., of counsel), for respondent Eskin.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers and Warehousemen's Union, Local 805, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against the Union and M. Eskin & Son of East Brunswick, New Jersey. In answer to the Union's petition, the Board has requested enforcement of the order insofar as it relates to Local 805. In a separate proceeding the Board has petitioned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases