1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 410 Pa.
  5. 410 Pa. 6 (1963)
 

RICHETTE v. PENNSYLVANIA R.R.

410 Pa. 6 (1963)

Richette, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 21, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Beasley, Sheldon L. Albert, with them Beasley & Ornsteen, for plaintiff.

Joseph Neff Ewing, Jr., with him Leonard D. Slutz, Ivar H. Peterson, and Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, for defendant union.

Robert M. Landis, with him Dechert, Price & Rhoads, for defendant railroad.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN and O'BRIEN, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE MUSMANNO, January 21, 1963:

The relationship between a lawyer and his client is a serious, vital and solemn one. No third person may interfere with that relationship any more than he may with propriety intervene between a doctor and his patient. A claimant or patient may, of course, disengage himself from a professional relationship provided he has met all obligations owing to his legal or medical counsellor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases