1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 129 S.E.2d
  5. 129 S.E.2d 283 (1963)
 

SEAWELL v. BRAME

No. 397.

129 S.E.2d 283 (1963)

258 N.C. 666

Lem D. SEAWELL v. Frank BRAME and Halifax Paper Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maupin, Broughton, Taylor & Ellis, Raleigh, for defendant appellant Brame.

Teague, Johnson & Patterson and Ronald C. Dilthey, Raleigh, for defendant appellant Halifax Paper Co., Inc.

H. F. Seawell, Jr., Carthage, and Royster & Royster, Oxford, for plaintiff appellee.

BOBBITT, Justice.

There was ample evidence to require the submission of plaintiff's case to the jury. Indeed, defendants abandoned their exceptions and assignments of error relating to the denial of their motions for judgment of nonsuit in failing to discuss them in their (joint) brief. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 810.

We pass, without discussion, all of defendants' assignments of error except those relating to the basis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases