ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. v. HILL


236 Or. 174 (1963)

387 P.2d 559

ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL v. HILL, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONER, PORTLAND MOTOR TRANSPORT, INC., ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 18, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Hollis and John G. McLaughlin, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With them on the briefs were Ellis & Hollis, Portland.

John F. Weisser, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Lloyd G. Hammel, Assistant Attorney General and Chief Counsel for Public Utilities Commissioner, Salem.

Earle V. White, Portland, argued the cause for Intervenor Respondents. With him on the brief was White & Southwell, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Plaintiffs brought this proceeding to set aside two orders of the Public Utilities Commissioner granting amended motor carrier permits to Portland Motor Transport, Inc. and Widing Transportation, Inc., who became intervenors in the proceeding. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Marion county circuit court sustaining the Commissioner's orders, on the ground that he had acted within the scope of his authority and upon substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases