Per Curiam.
Appellant's primary contentions are that he was sent to Lima in the first instance over his objection and without representation by counsel, and that his original hearings concerning the violation of his probation were heard without representation by counsel.
We will turn our attention first to appellant's contention that he is entitled to release for the reason that he was sent to Lima for psychiatric examination over his objection and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
