1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 217 F.Supp.
  5. 217 F.Supp. 189 (1963)
 

SCARBERRY v. OHIO RIVER COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 1147, Admiralty No. 1148.

217 F.Supp. 189 (1963)

Norman R. SCARBERRY, Plaintiff-Libellant, v. The OHIO RIVER COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

United States District Court S. D. West Virginia, at Huntington.

April 25, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Gill, Pittsburgh, Pa., and Arthur N. Smith, Jr., Charleston, W. Va., for plaintiff-libellant.

Campbell, McNeer, Woods, Bagley & Emerson, Charles F. Bagley, Huntington, W. Va., and Rose, Houston, Cooper & Schmidt, Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant-respondent.

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This action is brought under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C.A. § 688) to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff. The complaint alleges negligence on the part of the defendant, and is also brought under general maritime and admiralty law for unseaworthiness, and for maintenance and cure. The claim for maintenance and cure was settled for the sum of $4,070.00 during the trial, but all other issues of law and fact were submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases