1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 80 N.J.
  5. 80 N.J. Super. 321 (1963)
 

BERRY v. PENNA. R.R. CO.

80 N.J. Super. 321 (1963)

193 A.2d 569

HELEN BERRY, FURMAN F. BERRY, BRENDA F. BERRY, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HELEN BERRY, RUTH CONEY, AND EZEKIEL CONEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A/K/A PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, A/K/A THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, A CORPORATION, SOUTHERN RAILWAY SYSTEM, A/K/A SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, A/K/A SOUTHERN RAILWAY, A CORPORATION OR BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, AND THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 28, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel E. Bass for plaintiffs (Mr. Sam Freeman, attorney).

Mr. Raymond W. Troy for defendant Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brady for defendant Southern Railway Company (Messrs. Milton, Keane & DeBona, attorneys).

GIULIANO, J.S.C.

On February 26, 1963 defendant Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a/k/a Pennsylvania Railroad, a/k/a The Pennsylvania Railroad (Pennsylvania), filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to R.R. 4:58. This motion was consolidated for the purposes of oral argument with a motion filed by defendant Southern Railway System, a/k/a Southern Railway Company, a/k/a Southern Railway (Southern), to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases