1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 377 (1963)
 

STATE v. SANAPAW

21 Wis.2d 377 (1963)

STATE, Plaintiff in error, v. SANAPAW and another, Defendants in error. SAME, Plaintiff in error, v. BASINA, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was argued by John H. Bowers, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were George Thompson, attorney general, and Lyle E. Strahan, deputy attorney general.

For the defendants in error there was a brief and oral argument by Ken Traeger of Gresham.

CURRIE, J.

The question presented by the writs of error is:

Upon termination of federal supervision and control over the Menominee Indian Tribe and the Menominee Indian Reservation, did the enrolled members of the tribe and their lands become subject to the same Wisconsin game laws as other persons and lands within the state?

In order to resolve this question it is necessary to review the pertinent historical facts. These commence with the treaty of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases